![]() |
| |||||||
| Everquest Forum Everquest Forum |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| All the raids a piece of cake for most of the guilds. You can wear blue&green to run through karazhan; you can clear Zul’Aman in 2 hours with T4 gears. Now New buff system and class requirements has came out: Our goal was not to remove anything unique from the classes. Our goal was to get rid of anything that was considered so mandatory that you would consider scrapping a raid without that player. A great example is Bloodlust / Heroism. Raids were absolutely stacking shamans to do a rotation of these spells to the extent that we designed encounters assuming that would be the case. A slightly different example is Illidan. That encounter assumed (because it has been changed) that you had a warrior in the raid, and that the warrior was tanking. On the other hand, we didn't design any encounters for LK with the thought that "They'll use a death knight here to pull," or "The druid will use Rebirth here," or "You have to have Spell Reflect or you'll wipe" or "The rogues need to disarm the traps in the Suppression Room." Now all of those spells do have their uses and will make certain encounters easier. If those spells were of questionable or no utility then the class distinction really starts to devolve into damage, healing and tanking. But none of them should be mandatory. I don't think most guilds will call the raid if they don't have a DK for Malygos the way most guilds *did* call the raid if they didn't have a hunter (or two) and a mage for Maulgar (pre-last patch anyway). There are a few encounters we're keeping an eye on. Naxx 25 still has an encounter that requires 2 priests. That is probably a safe assumption for a raid of that size, but it's a slippery slope. If we had required 2 Shadow priests, for example, it would probably cross the line. (And no, we won't start implementing encounters like that when we allow dual-specs.) I also realize that some players (particularly those who don't play the class in contention) will argue that Rebirth or whatever is so powerful that raids will require a druid. Maybe there are some out there that do. A lot of these decisions are judgment calls on our part, and as I'm sure you all know, decisions on the part of raid leaders, especially inexperienced ones, can sometimes be misinformed. It’s the good chance for the players get epic gears from raids before Wotlk. Check: www.theapwowgold.com for more information. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WotLK system requirements | Brian Westley | Warcraft Forum | 27 | 10-10-2008 04:06 PM |
| To buff or not to buff, that is the question... | Bynahmar | Warcraft Forum | 16 | 11-28-2007 04:05 PM |
| Meta gem requirements | Jens Weiermann | Warcraft Forum | 5 | 10-31-2007 02:37 AM |
| Grouping requirements in EQ2 should go away! Wow has it right. | Thomas T. Veldhouse | Warcraft Forum | 39 | 06-14-2005 04:15 PM |
| minimum requirements | Marcel Kuijper | Microsoft Flight Simulator Forum | 10 | 01-31-2004 06:45 AM |